Instead of relying solely on diplomatic channels or regulatory penalties, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is now directing banks to tighten scrutiny, restrict financing, and even terminate relationships with companies linked to Indonesia’s forest fires.
MAS warned that lenders may need to limit exposure or cut ties with firms contributing to the haze blanketing the city‑state, as Singapore battles smoke from Indonesia’s worst forest fires in eleven years.
A new era has begun where financial institutions are expected to act as frontline enforcers of environmental risk management.
It also portrays that Singapore leverages its financial system, regulatory power, and cross‑border legal frameworks to influence corporate behavior beyond its borders. The country is positioning finance as a tool for environmental governance; one that could reshape regional supply chains, corporate compliance, and sustainability standards.
Singapore: Banks Must Consider Environmental Risks
MAS has instructed banks to investigate customers potentially involved in activities contributing to haze and determine whether they have adequate measures to prevent, detect, and stop fires.
Banks are expected to identify and manage environmental risks associated with lending, including pollution and deforestation. MAS emphasized that clear breaches of environmental laws warrant stronger measures, including limiting exposures or exiting relationships entirely.
MAS expects banks to review financing relationships with customers linked to haze‑related activities, engage them for information, and reassess ties if heightened environmental risks are identified. Singapore’s three major banks, DBS, OCBC, and UOB, have historically provided US $11 billion in financing to palm oil and forestry groups since 2010, according to Forests & Finance data cited by the publication.
The central bank reinforced its supervisory expectations under the Guidelines on Environmental Risk Management (2020) and Guidelines on Transition Planning (2026), urging banks to adopt a “zero‑tolerance” stance toward open burning and deforestation.
Senior Minister K. Shanmugam also called on Singaporean companies allegedly linked to haze activities to assess their operations and supply chains.
Singapore has issued legal notices to 10 companies registered in the country, seeking information on their operations and possible links to haze. The government plans to introduce amendments to the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act, strengthening investigators’ access to corporate records and premises.
Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo) has also questioned seven listed companies about their monitoring and handling of fires in their Indonesian supply chains, signaling that capital‑market scrutiny will complement banking pressure.
The amendments would give investigators full access to supply‑chain documentation, with non‑cooperative companies deemed in violation of the law.
Why Singapore is Escalating: The Worst Fires in 11 Years
Singapore’s directive comes amid Indonesia’s most intense forest fires in more than a decade.
Reuters reports that smoke from these fires has blanketed Singapore, raising tensions between the two neighbors and prompting calls for stronger cross‑border enforcement. The haze has disrupted daily life, reduced visibility, and triggered health advisories, underscoring the urgency of addressing the root causes of transboundary pollution.
Forest fires in Indonesia, particularly in Sumatra and Kalimantan, are often linked to land‑clearing practices in palm oil and pulp‑and‑paper supply chains.
Despite repeated crackdowns, illegal burning persists due to weak enforcement, economic incentives, and complex land‑tenure systems. Singapore’s frustration reflects years of diplomatic efforts that have yielded limited progress.
Singapore is addressing a critical leverage point by targeting financing: companies rely on banks and capital markets to fund operations, expansion, and supply‑chain activities. Restricting access to financing creates tangible consequences for environmental misconduct.
Finance as a Tool for Environmental Governance
Singapore’s defense indicates that global regulators use financial systems to enforce environmental standards. MAS’s directive positions banks as gatekeepers of sustainability, requiring them to integrate environmental risk assessments into lending decisions.
The country’s strategy shifts environmental accountability from regulators alone to financial institutions, which must now evaluate clients’ environmental practices. It creates market‑based incentives for companies to adopt sustainable practices, as poor environmental performance could lead to loss of financing.
Moreover, it aligns Singapore’s financial sector with global ESG standards, reinforcing its position as a leading financial hub.
The directive also reflects MAS’s long‑standing emphasis on environmental risk management.
The 2020 guidelines require banks to assess environmental risks in lending portfolios, while the 2026 transition‑planning guidelines push institutions to align financing with long‑term sustainability goals. The haze directive operationalizes these principles in a real‑world crisis.
Companies Impacted through Supply‑Chain Transparency and Legal Exposure
Companies linked to haze face heightened scrutiny from both regulators and financiers. Singapore’s legal notices to 10 companies signal that authorities are prepared to investigate supply‑chain practices thoroughly.
The planned amendments to the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act will give investigators full access to corporate records, supply‑chain documentation, and business premises, enabling deeper probes into fire‑related activities.
Companies that refuse to cooperate may be deemed in violation of the law, facing penalties and potential loss of financing.
SGX RegCo’s questioning of listed companies adds another layer of accountability, requiring firms to demonstrate robust monitoring and fire‑prevention measures in their Indonesian operations.
The regulatory pressure could force companies to invest in better fire‑prevention systems, improve supply‑chain traceability, and adopt stricter sustainability standards. It may also accelerate the shift toward certified sustainable palm oil and responsible forestry practices.
Turning Point for Southeast Asia’s Environmental Governance
Singapore’s directive represents a turning point in how Southeast Asia confronts environmental risks. Singapore is redefining the role of banks, regulators, and capital markets in addressing transboundary pollution by integrating environmental accountability into financial systems.
Ultimately, environmental risks are financial risks. Forest fires disrupt supply chains, damage assets, and create regulatory liabilities. Banks that finance environmentally risky activities face reputational damage, credit losses, and regulatory scrutiny.
Singapore’s move therefore aligns environmental governance with financial stability, creating a powerful incentive for sustainable practices across the region.
DOPAY, as a BSP‑licensed EMI and VASP, offers OFWs a low‑cost remittance pathway through in‑app user‑to‑user transfers, allowing OFWs to send money from abroad using crypto‑to‑PHP conversion and direct wallet‑to‑wallet transfers.
For overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) and local employees, DOPAY provides a reliable way to manage money, send remittances, and access digital financial tools protected by strong KYC and AML/CFT controls.
With DOPAY’s crypto wallet, you can gain crypto rewards for every trade under our Trade & Earn program. Not just that, with DOPAY’s Refer & Earn program, Filipinos can unlock new doors for earning possibilities with every successful referral.
Download the DOPAY app today!
