Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly entered classrooms across the Philippines, often faster than institutions can regulate it.
AI adoption among Filipino students is surging—83% report using generative AI tools like ChatGPT for schoolwork—yet schools and the Department of Education (DepEd) are still racing to build safeguards against risks such as academic dishonesty, data privacy breaches, and algorithmic bias.
Surveys conducted in 2025 by local education think tanks revealed that over 63% of Filipino students use generative AI tools like ChatGPT to draft essays and reports, while 58% rely on translation features to bridge language gaps. More than half use AI to summarize readings or explain complex concepts.
Teachers are also experimenting, with 71% reporting they use AI to create learning materials and 65% to generate quizzes. However, student adoption far outpaces educator confidence, reflecting a generational gap in readiness.
This adoption reflects global trends. A Pew Research Center survey in 2024 found that 72% of U.S. college students had used AI tools for coursework, while UNESCO reported that AI literacy programs are now being piloted in more than 40 countries.
Filipino students are part of this wave, but the pace of adoption raises questions about readiness, governance, and equity.
Globally and locally, the most common tools include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Grammarly, Duolingo, Quizlet, and Khan Academy’s AI features.
These platforms are used for writing, paraphrasing, summarizing, and even grading. While they offer efficiency, they risk reducing critical thinking if students rely too heavily on machine outputs.
A 2024 UNESCO survey found that over 60% of students worldwide had used AI tools for academic purposes, while only 30% of teachers felt confident integrating AI responsibly.
Locally, a Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) survey in 2025 revealed that four out of five students in Metro Manila had experimented with AI tools, but only one in three schools had formal policies governing their use.
AI Risks that Modern Students Face
AI can enhance learning by providing personalized feedback, simplifying complex topics, and improving language skills. For students with disabilities, AI-powered accessibility tools can be transformative, offering speech-to-text or adaptive learning pathways.
Yet overreliance can erode creativity, weaken problem-solving, and foster dependency. This imposes a challenge for educators is to integrate AI as a supplement rather than a substitute for authentic learning.
The risks are multifaceted. Academic dishonesty is the most immediate concern, as students can outsource assignments to AI, undermining authentic learning.
Privacy risks loom large, since many AI platforms collect sensitive data without clear safeguards.
Algorithmic bias is another issue: AI-driven proctoring tools have misinterpreted student behavior due to poor internet connections or cultural differences, leading to unfair penalties.
DepEd has acknowledged these risks. In 2026, it issued Order No. 003, which introduced guidelines for AI use in schools, including a national registry of approved tools and mandatory privacy impact assessments.
However, enforcement remains uneven, especially in rural schools with limited ICT infrastructure.
AI Governance in the Philippine Education System
The role of DepEd in mitigating IT risks is only one part of a broader governance ecosystem that must involve multiple government bodies.
DepEd’s mandate is to set standards for curriculum, pedagogy, and classroom technology, but the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) plays a crucial role in providing infrastructure and cybersecurity support.
The National Privacy Commission (NPC) ensures that student data collected by AI platforms is protected under the Data Privacy Act, while the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) develops AI literacy programs for universities and colleges.
Even the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) contributes by funding research on safe and ethical AI applications in education.
Together, these agencies form a multi-layered governance framework that can balance innovation with protection, ensuring that AI adoption in schools is both responsible and equitable.
Furthermore, DepEd Order No. 003, Series of 2026, is a landmark directive that sets the foundation for AI governance in Philippine schools.
The order establishes a national registry of approved AI tools, requiring schools to use only platforms vetted for security, privacy, and educational value.
It mandates privacy impact assessments before AI systems are deployed, ensuring that student data is not misused or exposed. The order also requires teacher training programs to build capacity in integrating AI responsibly, and it encourages schools to design assessments that AI cannot easily replicate, such as oral defenses, localized case studies, and project-based evaluations.
The benefits for students are significant: they gain access to AI tools that are safe, transparent, and aligned with learning objectives, while being shielded from risks such as data exploitation or overreliance on machine-generated outputs.
Through embedding of accountability and oversight into AI adoption, DepEd Order No. 003 helps ensure that students can harness the advantages of AI—personalized learning, accessibility, and efficiency—without compromising integrity or security.
Beneficial AI Use Cases
It is important to note that AI is not inherently dangerous. Tools that support language learning, adaptive quizzes, and personalized tutoring can enhance education when used responsibly.
AI can democratize access to knowledge, especially for students in underserved areas. The key lies in governance—ensuring transparency, accountability, and human oversight.
AI is already transforming finance in the Philippines. Banks and fintechs use AI for fraud detection, transaction monitoring, and customer service automation.
BSP requires financial institutions to adopt risk-based frameworks, ensuring AI systems comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and data privacy laws. AI also supports compliance with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards, ensuring that remittance flows remain secure and transparent.
For example, AI-driven real-time transaction monitoring systems flag unusual patterns, such as rapid layering of transfers or sudden spikes in account activity, helping institutions prevent financial crime.
This governance model offers a blueprint for education: AI can be harnessed safely if institutions enforce accountability and oversight.
Just as BSP ensures that AI in finance operates within strict compliance frameworks, DepEd can adopt similar principles to regulate AI in schools.
Moreover, in the Philippines, AI powers chatbots for customer service, predictive analytics for credit scoring, and fraud detection systems for e-wallets. These applications reduce costs, improve efficiency, and enhance trust in digital transactions.
For instance, BSP’s push for QR Ph interoperability relies on AI-driven systems to ensure seamless transfers across banks and e-wallets.
DOPAY: Your Responsible AI-Supported Wallet
As a BSP-licensed Electronic Money Issuer (EMI) and Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP), DOPAY leverages automated technologies to power its e-wallet and crypto wallet services. Its systems use AI-driven monitoring to secure transactions, minimize fees, and ensure compliance with local and international AML and FATF standards.
Not just that, with DOPAY’s Refer & Earn program, students and teachers alike can unlock new doors for earning possibilities with every successful referral.
Download the DOPAY app today!
